A judgment sample is a type of nonrandom sample that is selected based on the personal views or opinions of the individual, usually an expert in the field, making the selection.

Results obtained from a judgment sample are considered to be biased to some degree, due to the frame and population not being identical. The frame is the list or source from which the population to be sampled is derived from.

In the environmental context, a "judgment sample" refers to a non-random sampling method where samples are selected based on the judgment and expertise of the researcher or sampler. Instead of using a statistically random selection process, the judgment sample relies on the subjective assessment of the person conducting the sampling. Here is a closer look at the concept of judgment sampling in the environmental context, including examples and similar sampling methods:

1. Definition: Judgment sampling involves selecting samples that are believed to be representative or relevant based on the judgment and knowledge of the sampler. It relies on the expertise and experience of the sampler to identify locations, individuals, or units that are most likely to provide valuable information or insights.

2. Subjective selection: Unlike random sampling methods that use probability theory to ensure representativeness, judgment sampling relies on the judgment and subjective decision-making of the sampler. The sampler selects samples based on their own perception of what constitutes a representative sample.

3. Practicality and efficiency: Judgment sampling is often used in situations where random sampling may be impractical or resource-intensive. For example, in large-scale environmental assessments or monitoring programs, it may not be feasible to sample every location or unit, and judgment sampling provides a more efficient way to collect data.

4. Expert knowledge: Judgment sampling is particularly useful when the sampler possesses expert knowledge or understanding of the environmental system being studied. Their expertise allows them to identify key areas, individuals, or factors that are likely to be relevant for the research objectives.

5. Qualitative research: Judgment sampling is commonly used in qualitative research methods, where the focus is on understanding subjective experiences, perspectives, or phenomena. In qualitative studies, the goal is often to gather in-depth insights rather than achieving statistical representativeness.

6. Example 1: In an environmental impact assessment, a researcher may use judgment sampling to select specific sites or areas for field surveys based on their knowledge of the project and its potential impacts. They may target areas that are expected to be most affected or areas with unique ecological characteristics.

7. Example 2: In a study on air pollution, a researcher may use judgment sampling to select sampling locations based on their knowledge of local emission sources, topography, and wind patterns. They may choose sites that are likely to represent different levels of exposure or areas where vulnerable populations reside.

8. Example 3: In a study on wildlife behavior, a researcher may use judgment sampling to observe and collect data on specific species based on their knowledge of their habitats, movement patterns, or social dynamics. They may focus on locations or times that are most likely to provide meaningful observations.

9. Similar sampling methods: While judgment sampling is a non-random sampling method, there are other similar sampling approaches used in environmental research:

a) Convenience sampling: Convenience sampling involves selecting samples based on their convenient accessibility. It is often used when time, resources, or logistical constraints prevent the use of more rigorous sampling methods. Convenience sampling may result in biased samples but can still provide valuable insights in certain situations.

b) Purposive sampling: Purposive sampling is similar to judgment sampling as it involves the deliberate selection of samples based on specific criteria or purposes. Purposive sampling aims to include samples that are most relevant to the research objectives or specific characteristics of interest.

c) Snowball sampling: Snowball sampling is a technique where initial participants or locations are selected based on judgment, and additional participants or locations are identified through referrals or recommendations. It is commonly used when studying hard-to-reach or hidden populations.

d) Quota sampling: Quota sampling involves selecting samples to meet predetermined quotas based on specific characteristics, such as demographics or geographic regions. Quota sampling aims to ensure proportional representation of different groups within the sample.

In conclusion, judgment sampling is a non-random sampling method used in the environmental context where samples are selected based on the judgment and expertise of the sampler. It is often employed in situations where random sampling is not feasible or when the expertise of the sampler is critical for selecting relevant samples. While judgment sampling may lack the statistical representativeness of random sampling, it allows researchers to make informed decisions based on their knowledge and understanding of the environmental system being studied. Other similar sampling methods include convenience sampling, purposive sampling, snowball sampling, and quota sampling. Choosing the most appropriate sampling method depends on the research objectives, available resources, and the level of representativeness required.

--